Edition 023Thursday, 8 October 2026
Archive· RSS·
The $500 Ladder

Primary sources. Published arithmetic. No courses.

$500 idea · Pattern break · Edition 023

DOJ priced the door into this market at exactly $500.

The Executive Office for United States Trustees, costing its own 2013 rule, wrote that “this cost for submitting an application should equal approximately $500 per application for providers.” What $500 buys is approval to sell a two-hour course that 468,238 Americans a year take because the Bankruptcy Code will not discharge them otherwise — DOJ’s own estimate, filed 27 May 2025. The same rulemaking caps the price: “$50 is presumed to be a reasonable fee for an instructional course.” The market now charges $7.95.

There are two mandatory courses in an American personal bankruptcy and almost everyone thinks they are the same thing. They are not, and the difference is the whole trade. 11 U.S.C. 111 keeps two lists: “nonprofit budget and credit counseling agencies” for the course you must take before filing, and “instructional courses concerning personal financial management” for the one you must take after. The first list has a nonprofit test written into the statute. The second has none at all.

That is not a drafting accident anyone has fixed in twenty years. Section 111(c)(2) spells out what a counselling agency must carry: an independent board, trust accounts, “an annual audit,” counsellors paid without regard to outcome. Section 111(d)(1) asks a provider of the instructional course for four things — trained personnel, learning materials, facilities “if applicable” (telephone and internet are expressly allowed), and records. Both must “charge a reasonable fee, and provide services without regard to ability to pay the fee.” Only one must be a charity.

So the second course is an open market in a compelled purchase, and the Justice Department has published both its entry price and its ceiling. Clifford J. White III, then Director of EOUST, signed the final rule on 14 February 2013; it took effect 15 April 2013 as 28 CFR 58.26 and following. Approval runs six months on probation, then one-year renewals. The fee rule is explicit: “$50 is presumed to be a reasonable fee,” and “fees in excess of $50 per person are not presumptively reasonable.” At the time, EOUST wrote, it “currently has approved approximately 270 providers,” of whom “over 90 percent … charge $50 or less,” at a 2011 mean of $42.

Now look at what the ceiling actually did. It did not bind. $$ Bankruptcy Debtor Education sells the course at $7.95 per household. $10 Debtor Education, LLC sells it at $9.99. 001 DebtorEdu LLC, of Jersey City, sells it at $19.95. Against the 2011 mean of $42 that is a 81.1% nominal decline, and $7.95 is 15.9% of the number DOJ thought reasonable. A price cap is supposed to be the binding constraint in a regulated market. Here it is a rounding error above the clearing price.

The reason is visible on the government’s own web page, and it is the strangest thing in this edition. The USTP publishes the approved-provider list alphabetically. Read the top of it today: #WestbayEconomics. $$ Bankruptcy Debtor Education. $$$$$$0$ Bk Class, Inc. $$$$$Simple Class, Inc. $10 Debtor Education, LLC. 001 Debtoredu LLC. 1$ Wiser Consumer Education, Inc. These are not charities with unfortunate names. They are for-profit corporations that renamed themselves around a sort order, because on a list where every row sells an identical statutory certificate, position and price are the only two variables left.

Which tells you precisely where not to compete, and the inverse is the route. The debtor is not the buyer. 001 DebtorEdu’s own course page says the $19.95 fee is “Paid by your Attorney” — the consumer bankruptcy firm picks one provider, folds the certificate into its flat fee, and sends every file for the life of the relationship. That buyer never sees the alphabetical list, never comparison-shops $7.95 against $9.99, and is wholly indifferent between $19.95 and the $50 presumption because the money is already inside a quoted price. The race to the bottom is happening in a channel the money is not in.

And the compelled population is growing for the first time in a decade. The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts reported on 28 July 2026 that bankruptcy filings rose 12.2% in the year to 30 June 2026, to 608,511, with non-business filings at 581,570 — 382,161 chapter 7 and 215,490 chapter 13. DOJ’s 468,238 course-takers is 80.5% of that, and it is a 2025 estimate against a 2026 count, so it is already stale on the low side.

The counterweight is the sentence both courses share. Section 111(d)(1)(E) requires service “without regard to ability to pay the fee,” and the rule presumes inability where household income is under 150% of the poverty guidelines — $23,940 for one person in 2026, $32,460 for two. The customer is, by construction, insolvent. EOUST’s own July 2009 survey of providers found 12.2% of certificates issued at no cost and another 13.9% at reduced cost, before the waiver was even mandatory. Whatever you post, you will not collect all of it.

CERTIFICATES A YEAR FOR $60,000, AGAINST THE FEE CHARGED CEILING: 28 CFR 58 · WAIVER RATES: EOUST PROVIDER SURVEY, JULY 2009 · POOL: 90 FR 22327 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 FEE POSTED PER CERTIFICATE MARKET TODAY $7.95–$19.95 $50 PRESUMPTION 2011 MEAN $42 4,682 = 1% OF DOJ’S 468,238 9,335 AT $7.95 1,484 AT $50 12.2% FREE + 13.9% REDUCED 7,547 AT $7.95 3,008 AT $19.95 1,200 AT $50 · 100 A MONTH 1 px = $0.10 OF FEE · 1 px = 31.25 CERTIFICATES · N = $60,000 ÷ FEE · ENTRY $500, NO EXAM, NO BOND, NO NONPROFIT TEST
Both curves are the same hyperbola, N = $60,000 ÷ fee, and the gap between them is the only thing on this page that is not a posted number. The green curve assumes every buyer pays what is posted. The orange curve applies the waiver rates EOUST measured from provider self-reporting in July 2009 — “12.2 percent of certificates were issued at no cost, with another 13.9 percent issued at reduced cost” — modelling the reduced band at half price, so realised revenue is 80.85% of posted and N becomes $60,000 ÷ (0.8085 × fee). That halving is this page’s assumption, not DOJ’s. What the shape shows is where effort has to go: between $7.95 and $19.95 the curve is almost vertical, so a dollar of price is worth thousands of certificates, while above $40 it is flat and nothing you do to price matters. The market has crowded itself into the vertical part, where the $50 ceiling is irrelevant and alphabetical position is not. Scale is 1 px = $0.10 of fee horizontally and 1 px = 31.25 certificates vertically, origin (90, 380); every plotted coordinate is in the derived evidence row. The dashed horizontal is 1% of the 468,238 course-takers DOJ estimated on 27 May 2025.

The evidence

7 findings

Two lists, and the nonprofit test is on one of them

The asymmetry is in the section heading and then in the text. Subsection (a) directs the clerk to maintain a public list of “(1) credit counseling agencies that provide services described in section 109(h) and are approved as nonprofit budget and credit counseling agencies” and “(2) instructional courses concerning personal financial management.” Subsection (c)(2) then loads the first list: an independent board, safekeeping and “an annual audit” of client trust accounts, disclosures, counsellors not paid on outcome, “adequate financial resources.” Subsection (d)(1) asks the second for four things only — “trained personnel with adequate experience,” learning materials, “adequate facilities … provided that the provider may provide services through telephonic or Internet services,” and retained records — with no nonprofit requirement anywhere in it. Both carry the same fee sentence: “if a fee is charged … charge a reasonable fee, and provide services without regard to ability to pay the fee.” Subsection (b) sets approval at “a probationary period not to exceed 6 months,” then “an additional 1-year period, and for successive 1-year periods thereafter.” Section 727(a)(11) and section 1328(g) are the enforcement: no certificate, no discharge.

The door, the ceiling and the waiver, all in one document: $500

This is the rule that prices both sides of the trade, and Clifford J. White III, Director of the Executive Office for United States Trustees, signed it on 14 February 2013. Entry: “EOUST anticipates that this cost for submitting an application should equal approximately $500 per application for providers,” against “approximately 270 providers” then approved and “an annual hour burden on providers … estimated to be ten hours.” Price: “$50 is presumed to be a reasonable fee for an instructional course,” and “fees in excess of $50 per person are not presumptively reasonable,” which a provider may rebut case by case. Waiver: a debtor is presumed unable to pay where “the debtor’s current household income is less than 150 percent of the poverty guidelines,” rebuttably, so a reduced fee is permitted. Product: the course runs “two hours, at a minimum” and must cover “budgeting, financial management, credit, consumer information, and coping with financial crisis.” And the market as it then stood: “over 90 percent of approved providers charge $50 or less,” GAO’s 2007 mean fee was $43, and “as of 2011, the mean fee for providers among all providers is $42.” On uptake, from provider self-reporting as of July 2009: “12.2 percent of certificates were issued at no cost, with another 13.9 percent issued at reduced cost.”

DOJ’s own count of the compelled population: 468,238

The freshest federal estimate of how many people must buy this course, and of how many entities bother to apply to sell it. “It is estimated that 135 respondents will complete the Application,” with “initial applicants … approximately ten (10) hours,” “standard renewal applicants … approximately four (4) hours” and “refreshing renewal applicants … approximately nine (9) hours.” On the other side, “approximately 468,238 debtors will complete a survey” of “approximately one (1) minute” — the survey every course-taker completes, so it is DOJ’s working count of annual completions. “The estimated total annual public burden associated with this collection is 8,498 hours.” Signed by Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer for PRA. The direction of travel matters: the comparable 2016 notice (81 FR, 13 June 2016) estimated “195 respondents will complete the application” and “966,868 debtors,” so applications are down a third and course volume down by half across nine years — while filings have just turned.

Agency documentation · published roster USTP, List of Approved Providers of Personal Financial Management Instructional Courses (Debtor Education) as displayed 8 October 2026

The roster, in the order the government prints it: #, $, 0, 1

The single most revealing artefact in this edition is a sort order. USTP publishes the approved-provider list alphabetically, filterable by judicial district, state and language, with columns for name, contact and delivery method; it runs to 423 pages of district-level rows, and the XML export is “sorted by state, district, and agency name.” The first entries as displayed today: #WestbayEconomics, $$ Bankruptcy Debtor Education, $$$$$$0$ Bk Class, Inc., $$$$$Simple Class, Inc., $10 Debtor Education, LLC, 001 Debtoredu LLC, 1$ Wiser Consumer Education, Inc., 1stopbk.com Inc., 247 Bankruptcy Class, Inc., then the first ordinary name, A Debt Coach Credit Counseling Service, Inc. Seven of the first nine are incorporated for-profit forms, named for position. The page also notes that a provider “may be approved to serve areas outside their physical location,” which is why a Jersey City LLC can be on every district’s list. The gate is nonetheless real: in Case No. 2014-1 the Director upheld removal of Hummingbird Credit Counseling and Education, Inc. (Agency No. 1365) from this list and denial of its application to teach online in “all 88 judicial districts,” under 28 CFR 58.33(a)’s requirement to “comply with all applicable laws and regulations of the United States and each state.”

Live listings · provider price pages $$ Bankruptcy Debtor Education · $10 Debtor Education, LLC · 001 DebtorEdu LLC checked 8 October 2026

The cap never bound: $7.95, $9.99, $19.95

Three approved providers, three posted prices, all per household rather than per person, so a joint filing pays once. $$ Bankruptcy Debtor Education: “Buy Now For $7.95,” and joint filers “can register and take the course together for the one low price of $7.95 per household.” $10 Debtor Education, LLC: “Start Now For $9.99.” 001 DebtorEdu LLC of Jersey City, approved in all states and territories: $19.95 per household for the pre-discharge course, with the hard-copy certificate and court filing each $19.95 extra, per person. The line that gives away the channel is on DebtorEdu’s own page: the fee is “Paid by your Attorney.” That is the buyer. Note also the disclaimer every provider must run, that the USTP reviewed only the course and its approval “does not endorse or assure the quality” of the provider — the government supplies the compulsion and the list, and explicitly declines to supply the differentiation.

Judiciary statistics · Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Bankruptcies Rise 12.2 Percent, Table F-2 published 28 July 2026, year ending 30 June 2026

The pool turned: 581,570 non-business filings

The denominator, counted rather than estimated. Total filings for the twelve months ending 30 June 2026 were 608,511, against 542,529 a year earlier, a rise of 12.2%. Non-business filings — the people who must take this course — “rose 12 percent to 581,570” from 519,486. Chapter 7 filings went from 333,321 to 382,161; chapter 13 from 200,290 to 215,490; chapter 11 from 8,408 to 10,320; business filings “rose 16.9 percent, from 23,043 to 26,941.” Both chapters matter here, because the pre-discharge course is a condition of discharge under section 727(a)(11) in chapter 7 and section 1328(g) in chapter 13 alike. Set that against DOJ’s 468,238 and the federal estimate is running at 80.5% of the filed count, a year behind a series that has just started climbing.

Derived from the rows above · arithmetic shown

1,200 certificates, and the plotted points behind the figure

The chart first. Horizontal scale 1 px = $0.10 of fee across $60, vertical 1 px = 31.25 certificates across 10,000, origin at (90, 380). Fees plot at x = 90 + 10 × fee: $7.95 → 169.5, $9.99 → 189.9, $19.95 → 289.5, $42 → 510, $50 → 590, $60 → 690. Counts plot at y = 380 − N ÷ 31.25. Green curve, N = 60,000 ÷ fee: 7,547.17 at $7.95 → y 138.5, 6,006.01 at $9.99 → 187.8, 3,007.52 at $19.95 → 283.8, 1,428.57 at $42 → 334.3, 1,200.00 at $50 → 341.6, 1,000 at $60 → 348.0, and the curve meets the top axis at $6.00 → (150, 60). Orange curve, N = 60,000 ÷ (0.8085 × fee), where 0.8085 = 1 − 0.122 − (0.139 ÷ 2): 9,334.78 at $7.95 → y 81.3, 7,428.58 at $9.99 → 142.3, 3,719.87 at $19.95 → 261.0, 1,766.94 at $42 → 323.5, 1,484.23 at $50 → 332.5, 1,236.86 at $60 → 340.4, meeting the top axis at $7.42 → (164.2, 60). The dashed horizontal is 468,238 × 1% = 4,682.38 → y 230.2; the shaded band spans x 169.5 to 289.5. Now the market. Against the 2011 mean of $42, $7.95 is 7.95 ÷ 42 − 1 = −81.07% and $19.95 is −52.50%; against the presumption, 7.95 ÷ 50 = 15.90%. Share of DOJ’s 468,238 needed for $60,000: 0.2563% at $50, 0.3051% at $42, 0.6423% at $19.95, 1.2827% at $9.99, 1.6118% at $7.95. The whole national market at the ceiling is 468,238 × $50 = $23,411,900 a year, so $60,000 is 0.256% of it. The door repays itself in $500 ÷ $50 = 10 certificates, or 62.9 at $7.95. Channel arithmetic: 1,200 ÷ 200 = 6 consumer firms filing 200 chapter 7 cases each, or 100 certificates a month. Two reads on the 2025 notice. DOJ’s 468,238 is 80.51% of the judiciary’s 581,570; and 966,868 → 468,238 across nine years is a −51.57% fall in estimated course volume. Back out the applicant mix: 468,238 debtor-minutes is 7,803.97 hours, so the 8,498-hour total leaves 694 hours for 135 applications, and if those split only between 10-hour initials and 4-hour standard renewals, initials solve to 25.7 — an upper bound on new entrants per year, because the notice’s 9-hour refreshing-renewal category would absorb some of those hours. Four things are not hardened. The 0.8085 realisation factor halves EOUST’s “reduced cost” band on this page’s own assumption, and the underlying survey is July 2009 self-reporting, before the waiver was mandatory — today’s rate is unpublished and the population is poorer. The $50 presumption is a presumption about reasonableness, not a statutory maximum, and no public dataset reports fees actually collected. The 468,238 figure is a PRA estimate of survey responses, not a count of certificates. And the binding one: at $7.95 the posted price is already below any plausible cost of acquiring a customer one at a time, so the arithmetic above only closes through a firm that sends files in bulk — which is a sales problem the Bankruptcy Code does not solve for you.

The ladder

From $500 to $5,000 a month

Seven rungs. The product is a two-hour course nobody wants, sold to a lawyer rather than to the person who takes it.

  1. Read which of the two courses has no charity test

    Section 111(a) keeps two lists. The pre-filing course must come from a “nonprofit budget and credit counseling agency” carrying an independent board, trust accounts and an annual audit. The pre-discharge course under 111(d) has none of that, and no nonprofit requirement at all. Seven of the first nine names on the public roster are incorporated for-profits.

    111(c)(2) nonprofit + audit · 111(d)(1) neither
  2. Pay the entry price DOJ itself published

    EOUST costed its own rule: approximately $500 per application, ten hours of work, no examination, no bond, no filing fee charged by the government. Approval is for a probationary period of up to six months, then successive one-year renewals, which a standard renewal takes about four hours to file.

    $500 · 10 hrs · 6-month probation · 1-yr renewals
  3. Build the two hours to the stated syllabus

    The rule specifies the product: “two hours, at a minimum,” covering budgeting, financial management, credit, consumer information and coping with financial crisis, delivered in person, by telephone or over the internet, with no commercial advertising and no selling of financial products inside the course. That last clause is why this cannot be a lead magnet for something else.

    2 hrs · internet permitted · no advertising · no cross-sell
  4. Do not fight for the top of the alphabet

    #WestbayEconomics, $$ Bankruptcy Debtor Education, $$$$$$0$ Bk Class, $$$$$Simple Class, $10 Debtor Education LLC. The incumbents have already spent their differentiation on a sort order and taken the price from a 2011 mean of $42 down to $7.95. That column of the market is finished; entering it means winning a race that is already at 15.9% of the ceiling.

    $42 mean 2011 → $7.95 today · −81.1%
  5. Sell to the firm, because the firm is the buyer

    001 DebtorEdu’s own page says the $19.95 fee is “Paid by your Attorney.” A consumer bankruptcy firm picks one provider, folds the certificate into a quoted flat fee and never revisits the choice. One firm filing 200 chapter 7 cases a year is 200 certificates; six of them is the whole target. Sell integration and filing, not price.

    1,200 ÷ 200 = 6 firms · 100 certificates a month
  6. Price at the presumption, not under it

    $50 is presumed reasonable and needs no justification; above it you carry the burden of proof. Over 90% of providers already sit at or under $50 and most sit far under. Inside an attorney’s flat fee the difference between $19.95 and $50 is invisible to the debtor and is the difference between 3,008 certificates a year and 1,200.

    $60,000 ÷ $50 = 1,200 · ÷ $19.95 = 3,008
  7. Budget the waiver before you budget anything else

    The rung that decides whether this works. Section 111(d)(1)(E) requires service “without regard to ability to pay,” and inability is presumed under 150% of poverty — $23,940 for one person in 2026, $32,460 for two. EOUST’s 2009 survey found 12.2% of certificates free and 13.9% reduced before the waiver was compulsory. Model the haircut, then set the volume.

    12.2% free · 13.9% reduced · 1,200 → 1,484 at $50

Sources

12 primary documents
  1. 11 U.S.C. 111, Nonprofit budget and credit counseling agencies; financial management instructional courses — current
  2. EOUST, Application Procedures and Criteria for Approval of Providers of a Personal Financial Management Instructional Course, 28 CFR 58.26 et seq. — signed 14 February 2013 by Clifford J. White III, effective 15 April 2013
  3. DOJ, Agency Information Collection Activities: Revisions of a Currently Approved Collection, OMB 1105-0085, 90 FR 22327 — published 27 May 2025
  4. DOJ, Executive Office for United States Trustees; Agency Information Collection Activities, OMB 1105-0085 — published 13 June 2016
  5. USTP, List of Approved Providers of Personal Financial Management Instructional Courses (Debtor Education) — as displayed 8 October 2026
  6. USTP, Frequently Asked Questions — Debtor Education — current
  7. EOUST, Case No. 2014-1, Hummingbird Credit Counseling and Education, Inc. (Agency No. 1365) — Notice of Removal 18 December 2013
  8. Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Bankruptcies Rise 12.2 Percent — published 28 July 2026, year ending 30 June 2026
  9. $$ Bankruptcy Debtor Education — personal financial management course, $7.95 — checked 8 October 2026
  10. $10 Debtor Education, LLC — personal financial management course, $9.99 — checked 8 October 2026
  11. 001 DebtorEdu LLC — post-bankruptcy (pre-discharge) course, $19.95 — checked 8 October 2026
  12. U.S. Courts, 150 Percent of HHS Poverty Guidelines — 2026 figures