South Korea · Edition 005Saturday, 24 October 2026
Archive· RSS·
The $500 Ladder

Primary sources. Published arithmetic. No courses.

$500 idea · Pattern break · South Korea · Edition 005

A statutory 1,550kW ceiling makes Korea's smallest electrical customers the only ones worth holding.

「전기안전관리법 시행규칙」 제26조제2호 caps a one-person 개인대행자 at facilities whose capacities sum to under 1,550 kilowatts. 별표 9 caps the same person at 60 weight points, which at the smallest low-voltage band is exactly 75 sites. Seventy-five sites of 50kW would be 3,750kW. The two ceilings were not drawn to agree, and the kilowatt one bites first — at an average customer size of 20.67kW. The 2026 fee for that smallest site is ₩142,476 a month, set by the ministry, not by the client.

Jump to the ladder

Starting capital for this edition is ₩661,955 [$500 USD at 1,323.9094, the xe.com mid-market rate quoted 24 October 2026 11:48 UTC]. The target is ₩6,619,547 a month [about $5,000 USD], or ₩79,434,564 a year.

The consensus reading of Korean electrical safety management is that it is a wage job with a licence attached: you pass 전기기사, you join a 대행업체, you are handed a route, and the industry is a permanent price war. The price-war half is documented and true. The rest inverts once you read who the statute actually rations, and in which unit.

Start with the price, because in this trade the price is a published number. 「전기안전관리법 시행규칙」 제32조: "법 제22조제7항에 따른 안전관리업무의 대행 대가는 「엔지니어링산업 진흥법」 제31조에 따른 엔지니어링사업의 대가 기준 중 실비정액가산방식에 따라 산정한다" ["the fee for delegated safety-management work under Article 22(7) of the Act shall be calculated by the actual-cost-plus-fixed-rate method among the engineering-business fee standards under Article 31 of the Engineering Industry Promotion Act"]. The 2026 전기설비 엔지니어링 표준품셈, published for the year and reported by 전기신문 on 28 January 2026, prices the smallest low-voltage site at ₩142,476 excluding VAT, up ₩7,805 on 2025's ₩134,671. Every band rose by the same 5.80%: ₩332,425 to ₩351,692 at 저압 500kW, ₩223,979 to ₩236,962 at 고압 100kW, ₩1,206,372 to ₩1,276,292 at 고압 1,000kW. That uniformity is the tell. Nobody re-measured the work; a single escalator was applied to a schedule the state now owns.

Which matters because of who used to own it. On 28 February 2011 전기신문's 김병일 reported that the trade association had built its own fee table in the early 2000s, that the 공정거래위원회 treated it as collusion and sanctioned the association, and that with no standard left the market bid itself down: 한국전기안전공사 had guaranteed roughly ₩100,000 a weight point, agencies were charging ₩50,000–70,000, and bids at ₩30,000 a point were common — about ₩1,800,000 a month for a technician's full 60-point book, which one industry figure said could not cover an office, an assistant, tax and insurance. The 2026 schedule prices the same smallest site at ₩142,476 for 0.8 points, which is ₩178,095 a point. The number a trade body was punished for publishing is now published by a ministry, at 5.9 times the dumping floor.

Now the ceiling nobody prices. 시행규칙 제26조 gives 안전공사 and a 대행사업자 facilities "둘 이상의 전기설비 용량의 합계가 4천 500킬로와트 미만" ["where the capacities of two or more electrical facilities sum to under 4,500 kilowatts"] with each 전기수용설비 "용량 1천킬로와트 미만". For an individual, 제26조제2호: "둘 이상의 용량의 합계가 1천 550킬로와트 미만인 전기설비로 한정한다", each 전기수용설비 "용량 500킬로와트 미만". 별표 9 then caps a company's technician at 78 points and the individual at 60. So the statute hands the employee of a firm 2.9 times the kilowatt allowance it hands the person working alone, and the allowance — not the point budget, not the site count — is what runs out first.

Spend that allowance badly and it is worth almost nothing. A 500kW low-voltage site returns ₩351,692 for 500 of your 1,550 kilowatts: ₩703 per kilowatt of allowance. A 20kW site returns ₩142,476 for 20: ₩7,124. Ten times the yield, for the customers every 대행업체 treats as not worth the drive. That is the trade. The arithmetic to the target is unforgiving and short: ₩6,619,547 ÷ ₩142,476 = 46.46, so 47 sites, and 1,550 ÷ 47 means every customer must average under 32.98kW. Above that, no amount of effort gets a solo 개인대행자 to $5,000 a month, because the ceiling, not the market, has taken it away.

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 5 10 20 30 40 50 Average customer capacity, kW Maximum lawful fee income, KRW million / month target $5,000 / month = KRW 6,619,547 company technician 4,500 kW 78 pts 85 sites individual agent 1,550 kW 60 pts 75 sites 20.67 kW ceiling starts biting 33.4 kW target lost here 47 sites is the last book that clears it at 50 kW the individual holds 31 sites = KRW 4,416,756
Both lines use one price, the 2026 표준품셈 저압 50kW 이하 figure of ₩142,476 a month ex-VAT, so the x-axis stops at 50kW where that band ends. Sites held = min(site cap, point budget ÷ weight, kilowatt allowance ÷ average capacity). For the individual that is min(75, 60÷0.8 = 75, 1,550÷c); the first two tie exactly at 75, so only the kilowatt allowance can bind, and it does from c = 1,550÷75 = 20.67kW. Flat stretch: 75 × ₩142,476 = ₩10,685,700. At 50kW: 31 × ₩142,476 = ₩4,416,756, a 2.42× fall for the same licence and the same working month. For a 대행사업자's technician it is min(85, 78÷0.7 = 111, 4,500÷c), which never leaves 85 inside this band because 4,500÷85 = 52.94kW sits past the right edge — hence the flat ₩12,110,460. The dashed horizontal is ₩6,619,547; the individual's line crosses it at 1,550 ÷ (6,619,547÷142,476) = 33.36kW. The company line does not cross it anywhere on this chart.

The evidence

11 findings
Statute「전기안전관리법」 제22조제3항 · 제22조제7항

One person, holding a qualification and a kit, may take the contract directly

제22조제3항 lets the owner of a 일정 규모 이하 전기설비 delegate safety management to 한국전기안전공사, to a registered 대행사업자, or to a third category the 찾기쉬운 생활법령정보 service renders as "전기 분야의 기술자격을 취득한 사람으로서 일정 장비를 보유하고 있는 개인대행자" ["an individual agent who has obtained a technical qualification in the electrical field and holds the specified equipment"]. No capital requirement appears in that limb, and no employer. 제22조제7항 is the hook the fee schedule hangs from.

Regulation「전기안전관리법 시행규칙」 제26조 (대행규모)

The allowance: 1,550kW for a person, 4,500kW for a firm

제26조제1호, 안전공사 and 대행사업자: "둘 이상의 전기설비 용량의 합계가 4천 500킬로와트 미만 경우로 한정한다", with 가목 "용량 1천킬로와트 미만의 전기수용설비". 제26조제2호, 개인대행자: "둘 이상의 용량의 합계가 1천 550킬로와트 미만인 전기설비로 한정한다", 가목 "용량 500킬로와트 미만의 전기수용설비", 나목 발전설비 150kW 미만 (비상용 예비발전설비 300kW 미만), 다목 태양광 250kW 미만, or 750kW with 원격감시 및 제어기능. The ratio between the two allowances is 2.90×.

Regulation「전기안전관리법 시행규칙」 별표 9 · 개정 2022. 4. 22.

60 points for an individual, 78 for a firm's technician — and the weights run the other way

별표 9: "사업소 또는 영업소 소속 기술인력 1명이 담당하는 가중치 합계는 78점 이하인 범위에서 할 수 있다"; an 개인대행자's total may not exceed 60. Per-site weights (대행사업자 / 개인대행자) and site caps: 저압 50kW 이하 0.7 / 0.8, 85 / 75 사업장; 저압 100–200kW 1.0 / 1.3, 60 / 46; 저압 400kW 초과 2.6 / 3.0, 23 / 20; 고압 100kW 이하 1.0 / 1.2, 60 / 50; 고압 400–500kW 3.4 / 4.0, 17 / 15. Inspection at least monthly, rising to twice above 300kW. The individual is charged a heavier weight for the identical site and given a smaller budget to spend it from.

Regulation「전기안전관리법 시행규칙」 제32조 (대가) · 제31조 (대행 범위)

The fee is a formula, and the territory is one province

제32조: "법 제22조제7항에 따른 안전관리업무의 대행 대가는 「엔지니어링산업 진흥법」 제31조에 따른 엔지니어링사업의 대가 기준 중 실비정액가산방식에 따라 산정한다". 제31조: "대행사업자 및 개인대행자가 대행할 수 있는 범위는 그 등록을 한 시ㆍ도지사의 관할구역으로 한다" ["the area in which an agency operator or individual agent may act is the jurisdiction of the 시ㆍ도지사 with whom the registration was made"]. The second sentence is why the 47-site book has to be geographically dense, and why density and small size point the same way.

Reported전기신문, 조정훈, 28 Jan 2026 · 2026년 전기설비 엔지니어링 표준품셈

The 2026 schedule: ₩142,476 at the bottom, +5.80% everywhere

Figures ex-VAT, against the prior year: 저압 50kW 이하 ₩142,476 (+₩7,805); 저압 500kW ₩351,692 (+₩19,267 from ₩332,425); 고압·특고압 100kW ₩236,962 (+₩12,983 from ₩223,979); 고압·특고압 1,000kW ₩1,276,292 (+₩69,920). 한국전기기술인협회 (회장 김동환) is the industry source; 정상웅, head of its legal support department, says the schedule should be used to size fees by capacity and that the association will push 지자체 and other public and private clients to adopt it. The article cites 전기안전관리법 제22조제7항 as the basis and describes the method as 실비정액가산방식.

Reported전기신문, 조정훈, 10 Jan 2025 · 2025년 전기설비 엔지니어링 표준품셈(대행대가)

The 2025 base: ₩134,671, and a 1.8% year

저압 50kW 이하 "13만4671원"; 저압 500kW "33만2425원"; 고압·특고압 100kW "22만3979원"; 고압·특고압 1,000kW, inspected four or more times a month, "120만6372원". The article puts the 2025 average rise at about 1.8%, credits 산업통상자원부 as the source, and cites 전기안전관리법 제22조제7항 together with 「엔지니어링산업 진흥법」 제31조. Set against 2026, every one of the four bands moved by 5.795–5.797% — one escalator, not a re-measurement.

Reported전기신문, 김병일, 28 Feb 2011, 제2671호 11면

The trade body's own fee table was punished as collusion

The association built a fee table in the early 2000s; it was voluntary, and the 공정거래위원회 treated it as collusion and sanctioned the association. With the table gone, 한국전기안전공사's guaranteed roughly ₩100,000 a point became the benchmark, agencies charged ₩50,000–70,000, and bids near ₩30,000 a point spread — about ₩1,800,000 a month on a full 60-point book, which the industry said could not cover office, assistant, tax and insurance. The article warns the shortfall was being made up with rented licences and unqualified staffing, and that the industry wanted a 최저가 보장제 from government precisely because its own version had been illegal.

Regulator filing법제처 법령해석 25-0241 · 회신 2 Jun 2025

Every size limit must be cleared separately, and the exception is read strictly

Asked whether one 대행사업자 could take both an 800kW 전기수용설비 and a 610kW 비상용 예비발전설비 at the same site, 법제처 answered "대행사업자에게 대행하게 할 수 없습니다" ["the work may not be delegated to an agency operator"]: the 수용설비 clears 시행규칙 제26조제1호 가목's 1,000kW, but the generator breaches 라목's 500kW, and delegation is an exception to the 제22조제1항 duty to appoint a manager, so it is construed narrowly, citing 대법원 2020. 5. 28. 선고 2017두73693 판결. Read across to 제26조제2호, an individual who lets one customer tip the running total past 1,550kW has not stretched a guideline; they have left the statutory exception entirely.

Platform documentation정부24 민원 전기안전관리대행업체(변경)등록 · CappBizCD 14100000136

Ten working days, two attachments, and no capital proof for a person

The 민원 covers "전기안전관리 대행사업자 및 개인대행자". Documents listed for registration are a 자본금 증명 서류, a 실무경력 확인 서류 or 전력기술인경력확인서, and a 장비명세서; 시행규칙 제38조제4항 asks an 개인대행자 for only the last two, with the 사업자등록증 pulled through 행정정보 공동이용. 처리기간 10일. Fees cite 법 제42조제1항 and 시행규칙 제44조 별표18, marked "기술인력 변경신고의 경우만 해당". 접수 and 처리 now sit with 기후에너지환경부 and 한국전기기술인협회, online at keea.or.kr — the department is 에너지안전효율과.

Live listing공공데이터포털 · 한국전기안전공사_전기안전관리대행 유지현황_20251231 · registered 28 Jul 2026

The incumbent publishes its own churn, office by office

91 rows, 2019–2025, fields 사업소명, 사업소코드, 연도, 계약건수, 해지건수, 유지건수 — every KESCO branch's wins, losses and retained book, updated annually, managed by 디지털시스템부. The description states the delegation window as "75kW 이상 4,500kW 미만". Alongside it, 경기도 수원시 publishes 전기안전관리대행업현황 — 37 rows carrying 업종, 업체명, 대표자명, address, latitude and longitude, reference date 30 July 2025. The register of everyone you are bidding against, with names and map coordinates, is a free download.

Derivedarithmetic shown · rate 1,323.9094 on 24 Oct 2026

Forty-seven sites, every one under thirty-three kilowatts

$5,000/mo × 1,323.9094 = ₩6,619,547 a month, ₩79,434,564 a year; $500 = ₩661,955. Diagram coordinates, all at the 2026 저압 50kW 이하 fee of ₩142,476/month: individual sites = min(75, 60÷0.8 = 75, 1,550÷c); flat segment 75 × 142,476 = ₩10,685,700 to c = 1,550÷75 = 20.67kW; then 1,550÷25 = 62 → ₩8,833,512; 1,550÷30 = 51 → ₩7,266,276; 1,550÷40 = 38 → ₩5,414,088; 1,550÷50 = 31 → ₩4,416,756, a fall of 10,685,700÷4,416,756 = 2.42×. Company technician = min(85, 78÷0.7 = 111, 4,500÷c) = 85 throughout, since 4,500÷85 = 52.94kW > 50; 85 × 142,476 = ₩12,110,460. Target crossing: 6,619,547÷142,476 = 46.46 sites, so 1,550÷46.46 = 33.36kW; the last whole book that clears it is 47 × 142,476 = ₩6,696,372 [$5,058] at an average of 1,550÷47 = 32.98kW. Allowance yield: 142,476÷20 = ₩7,124/kW against 351,692÷500 = ₩703/kW, a ratio of 10.13×. Price per weight point: 142,476÷0.8 = ₩178,095, against the ₩30,000 dumping floor of 2011 = 5.94×, and against KESCO's ₩100,000 = 1.78×. Annual ceiling for a one-person book: 10,685,700 × 12 = ₩128,228,400 [$96,856].

The ladder

From $500 to $5,000 a month · ₩662,315 → ₩6,623,150

시행규칙 제38조제4항 asks an 개인대행자 for a 등록신청서 on 별지 제22호서식 plus two things: proof of practical experience or a 전력기술인경력확인서, and a 장비명세서. The 자본금 증명 서류 on the 정부24 민원 page belongs to the 대행사업자 limb. Ten working days, filed with the 시ㆍ도지사 through 한국전기기술인협회.

  1. Register as a person, not as a company

    시행규칙 제38조제4항 asks an 개인대행자 for a 등록신청서 on 별지 제22호서식 plus two things: proof of practical experience or a 전력기술인경력확인서, and a 장비명세서. The 자본금 증명 서류 on the 정부24 민원 page belongs to the 대행사업자 limb. Ten working days, filed with the 시ㆍ도지사 through 한국전기기술인협회.

    2 attachments · 10 days · no 자본금
  2. Spend the capital on the 장비명세서, because that is the only gate

    The statute's words for the individual limb are a technical qualification and 일정 장비; 시행규칙 제33조 sends the list to 별표 10. ₩661,955 is a kit budget, not a licence fee. Price the list before anything else: it is the one line on the form that can actually stop you, and it is the one the trade talks about least.

    ₩661,955 → 별표 10
  3. Count in kilowatts, never in sites

    Your real inventory is 1,550 kilowatts of statutory allowance. The 60-point budget and the 75-site cap tie exactly at the smallest band, so neither will ever bind before the kilowatts do. Every prospect is a question with one number in it: what fraction of 1,550 does this consume, and what does it pay for that fraction.

    1,550 ÷ 75 = 20.67kW
  4. Refuse the large customer on purpose

    A 500kW site pays ₩351,692 and eats 32% of the allowance: ₩703 a kilowatt. A 20kW site pays ₩142,476 for 1.3% of it: ₩7,124 a kilowatt. The large contract looks like the prize and is the single most expensive thing you can sign. Turning it down is not modesty, it is the arithmetic.

    ₩7,124/kW vs ₩703/kW = 10.13×
  5. Build the book inside one 시ㆍ도, tightly

    제31조 confines you to the jurisdiction you registered in, and 별표 9 requires at least one visit a month to each site. Forty-seven monthly visits is roughly two and a half a working day, which only works if the sites sit close together. Small, dense and local is the same instruction three times over.

    47 visits/month · 1 시ㆍ도
  6. Quote the published number and nothing under it

    제32조 names the method and the 2026 표준품셈 names the figure: ₩142,476 a month, ex-VAT, for 저압 50kW 이하. The association's own table was sanctioned as collusion in the 2000s; the ministry's is not, which is exactly why you can cite it in writing. Discounting here is discounting against a government document.

    ₩142,476 · 저압 50kW 이하 · 2026
  7. Know the two things that end it

    First, your own average: cross 33kW and the target leaves, whatever you do next. Second, the allowance itself. 1,550kW is a 부령 figure, revisable by the ministry that renamed itself 기후에너지환경부 this year; 법제처 25-0241 shows these limits read strictly and literally. Watch 입법예고 on 시행규칙 별표 9 and 제26조, not the trade press.

    33kW · 1,550kW · 입법예고

More like this

Same series or same scarce input

Browse the catalog — every edition, by verdict, scarce input and window